Choosing the best Aviation lawyer in Qld

The law covering offences on aircraft in Australia

Criminal conduct on board aircraft, at airports, or directed at aviation safety is primarily regulated by the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 (Cth).

That Act gives effect to Australia’s international aviation security obligations and creates offences dealing with:

• Hijacking and unlawful seizure of aircraft

• Acts of violence against passengers or crew

• Interference with aircraft operation

• Threats, hoaxes, and false information relating to aircraft safety

• Dangerous conduct at certain airports

Because these offences arise under Commonwealth legislation, they operate differently from Queensland criminal offences in relation to procedure, prosecution, and sentencing. Specialist legal advice in Commonwealth crimes is critical in aviation cases.

What police must prove for aviation offences

The Police and the CDPP must prove each element of the charged offence beyond reasonable doubt.

Although each offence has its own elements, aviation cases commonly turn on issues such as:

• Whether the accused was on board an aircraft, or within a defined aviation security zone

• Whether the aircraft was in flight or preparing for flight within the meaning of the legislation

• Whether conduct involved force, threats, intimidation, or recklessness

• Whether the conduct interfered with safety, control, or crew duties

Courts assess the evidence as a whole.

What counts as hijacking an aircraft

Hijacking is among the most serious aviation offences in Australian law.

A person hijacks an aircraft if, while on board, they seize or exercise control of the aircraft by:

• force

• threat of force

• or any other form of intimidation

The offence does not require the aircraft to be diverted or landed elsewhere. Control can be exercised through intimidation directed at the crew, particularly pilots, if it affects their ability to operate the aircraft freely.

Hijacking is punishable by life imprisonment.

Assaults and interference with crew members

Australian aviation law treats assaults and intimidation of crew members with particular seriousness due to the safety risks involved.

Offences may arise where a person:

• assaults a crew member

• threatens violence

• intimidates or obstructs crew while they are performing duties

If the conduct interferes with the crew member’s ability to carry out operational or safety-related functions, sentencing exposure increases significantly.

These cases often involve disputes about:

• the nature of the conduct

• whether the crew member’s duties were actually affected

• whether the accused’s behaviour crossed the threshold from disorderly conduct into a serious aviation offence

Endangering the safety of an aircraft

Endangering an aircraft involves reckless conduct that places the aircraft, passengers, or crew at risk.

This can include conduct that:

• interferes with aircraft controls or equipment

• distracts or obstructs crew during critical phases of flight

• creates a foreseeable risk to safety

The offence does not require actual harm to occur. The focus is on the risk created by the conduct, assessed objectively.

Penalties increase where the conduct is likely to endanger life or cause serious harm.

Evidence police commonly rely on in aviation cases

Aviation prosecutions are evidence-driven and often rely on multiple sources of material, including:

• statements from passengers, pilots, and cabin crew

• in-flight incident reports

• airport and aircraft CCTV

• airline operational records

• audio or video recordings

• police body-worn camera footage

Because incidents occur in confined and highly regulated environments, evidence is often extensive but not always consistent. Careful analysis is required to identify inaccuracies, exaggeration, or unsupported assumptions.

What does not amount to an aviation offence

Not all disruptive or inappropriate conduct on a plane amounts to a serious aviation offence.

Depending on the facts, conduct may fall short where:

• behaviour was unpleasant but did not interfere with safety or operations

• alleged threats were ambiguous or not reasonably capable of causing fear

• crew duties were not materially affected

• the accused lacked the required intent or recklessness

Aviation matters are an area where overcharging can occur, particularly where intoxication or passenger complaints are involved. Distinguishing between lower-level misconduct and serious Commonwealth offences is a critical part of early defence analysis.

Penalties for aviation offences

Penalties vary significantly depending on the offence charged and the surrounding circumstances.

By way of general guidance:

• Hijacking an aircraft – maximum penalty of life imprisonment

• Serious interference with crew or aircraft safety – penalties up to 20 years imprisonment

• Reckless endangerment of aircraft – penalties commonly up to 10–14 years imprisonment

• Lower-level offences – fines or lesser custodial exposure may apply

Sentencing depends heavily on:

• the risk created

• whether safety was compromised

• the accused’s criminal history

• whether responsibility was accepted at an early stage

There are no automatic outcomes. Each case turns on its own facts.

What court will hear an aviation charge in Queensland

Although aviation offences are Commonwealth matters, they are commonly prosecuted in Queensland courts exercising federal jurisdiction.

Matters usually begin in the Magistrates Court and may then proceed to:

• the District Court, or

• the Supreme Court of Queensland

The court depends on the seriousness of the offence and the maximum penalty involved.

Early procedural steps, including bail and disclosure, are important and can affect how the matter progresses.

How aviation charges are defended

Defence strategies in aviation cases depend entirely on the evidence and the specific offence alleged.

Common defence considerations include:

• whether the conduct meets the statutory threshold

• whether safety or control was actually affected

• credibility and consistency of witness accounts

• reliability of video or audio evidence

• whether the accused’s conduct was mischaracterised

Early, detailed analysis of the brief of evidence is essential before decisions are made about plea or trial.

What to do if you are charged or under investigation

If you are charged with an aviation offence, or contacted by police about an incident on an aircraft, early steps matter.

General guidance includes:

• exercise your right to silence until you obtain legal advice

• preserve any material that may assist your defence

• avoid contacting witnesses

Our aviation lawyers have extensive experience defending these types of charges, including matters involving disputed facts, analysing evidence, and allegations of interference with aircraft safety. Early legal advice allows the evidence and procedural position to be assessed before decisions are made that may affect the course of the matter.

Final practical summary

Aviation offences are treated seriously under Australian criminal law because of the risks involved to passengers, crew, and public safety.

These are complex Commonwealth matters that differ significantly from Queensland criminal charges. Early legal advice, careful analysis of the evidence, and informed procedural decisions will make a difference to the outcome.

If you are facing aviation charges or an investigation, obtaining advice early from the best criminal defence lawyers in Brisbane is critical.