Indecent Treatment of a Child
When your job, reputation, and future are at risk, urgent advice from our leading Brisbane criminal lawyers is critical.
Early steps affect the outcome.
or
Choosing the best criminal defence lawyer in Queensland
A charge of indecent treatment of a child under Section 210 Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) is a serious criminal offence in Queensland and can often result in a sentence of actual imprisonment.
It is crucial to seek urgent legal advice from an experienced Brisbane indecent treatment lawyer. These cases are complex and may involve:
Disputed evidence – where the facts are challenged by both sides
Historical allegations – complaints made years after the alleged events
Forensic material – such as DNA, digital devices, or medical evidence
Witness credibility – questioning whether accounts are reliable or consistent
Media attention – the risk of your case being reported publicly
Because of these factors, extra sensitivity is essential to protect your reputation and future. Our Brisbane criminal defence lawyers have extensive experience negotiating with the prosecution, identifying weaknesses in the evidence, and negotiating discontinuance or reduced charges.
What is indecent treatment of a child under 16?
Section 210 Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) makes it an offence to involve a child under 16 in indecent conduct in a number of ways.
That includes:
indecently dealing with a child
getting a child to commit an indecent act
allowing a child to indecently deal with you
exposing a child to an indecent act
showing a child indecent material
taking or recording indecent images of a child
All of this must be unlawful and indecent. The law is deliberately broad. It captures both physical and non-physical conduct, including online behaviour.
Do police have to prove the child did not consent?
No. For this offence, the prosecutor does not need to prove the lack of consent. This is because a child under 16 is treated by law as incapable of giving legal consent to indecent conduct. This is one of the main difference with this charge, to charges of rape or sexual assault, where the prosecutor is required to prove the lack of consent.
What do police have to prove?
The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:
the complainant was under 16
the accused engaged in one of the acts in section 210 Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld)
the conduct was indecent
the conduct was unlawful
the accused was the person involved
The definition of ‘deals with’ is also important. It includes conduct that would amount to an assault if done without consent. To successfully defend a charge of indecent treatment, an experienced criminal lawyer can examine whether there is a gap in the evidence to one or more of these elements.
What does ‘indecent’ mean?
Whether conduct is ‘indecent’ depends on context. This is frequently an area of dispute at trial. The court will assess indecency objectively, based on community standards. The High Court has confirmed that indecency is judged by the standards of ordinary decent people, taking into account the circumstances of the act (see R v Harkin (1989) 38 A Crim R 296).
In practice, the court looks at:
the nature of the conduct
the age of the child
the relationship between those involved
the context in which it occurred
It does not require physical contact. Exposure, communication, or showing material can be enough. These cases often turn on how the evidence is analysed, particularly digital material.
Can you be charged without any physical contact?
Yes. Section 210 Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) specifically includes:
exposing a child to an indecent act
showing indecent material
recording indecent images
This includes allegations involving phones or online communication.
What is the maximum penalty for a charge of indecent treatment?
The maximum penalty depends on the age of the child and the circumstances.
Child aged 12 to 15 – up to 14 years imprisonment
Child under 12 – up to 20 years imprisonment
The maximum also increases to 20 years where:
the child is under the offender’s care or a relative
the offender knows the child has an impairment of the mind
What if I thought the child was over 16 years old?
There is a limited defence. If the child was 12 or older, it is a defence to prove that you honestly and reasonably believed they were at least 16.
This is not a low threshold. The belief must be:
genuinely held, and
reasonable when the circumstances are examined
That defence comes from section 210(5) Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld), which states, if the offence is alleged to have been committed in respect of a child of or above the age of 12 years, it is a defence to prove that the accused person believed, on reasonable grounds, that the child was of or above the age of 16 years.
How to defend a charge of indecent treatment of a child?
Common criminal law defence strategies for a charge of indecent treatment of a child includes:
identification – whether the accused was the person involved
whether the conduct actually occurred
whether the conduct was indecent in context
whether the prosecution can prove the case beyond reasonable doubt
mistake of fact as to age (where available)
In digital cases, a key issue is often whether the prosecution can prove who was using a device or account.
Which court will hear the charge?
All criminal charges will start in the Magistrates Court. The charge will then proceed through a ‘committal hearing’, and then be transferred to the District Court. This process can be anywhere from 6 months.
Once transferred, the prosecutor then has a further 6 months to present an ‘indicment’ in the District Court. This will formally introduce the case into the District Court. The case will then be listed either for trial or sentence.
Will I go to prison for a charge of indecent treatment of a child?
The sentencing outcome will depend on the circumstances in each case. This is a serious offence and if convicted, there is a high risk of actual imprisonment. This is particularly where:
the child is younger
the conduct is repeated or deliberate
the injury or harm which occured
Further, sexual offences involving children have a different set of sentencing principles in Queensland, under section 9 of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld).
The section provides that, for offences of a sexual nature involving a child under 16, the usual principle that imprisonment is a last resort does not apply. Instead, the court must approach sentencing on the basis that an offender will serve an actual term of imprisonment unless there are exceptional circumstances. This means that a person convicted of this charge will serve an actual time in custody, unless the court is satisfied there are exceptional circumstances.
When considering if there are exceptional circumstances, the court will assess it by the following principles:
closeness in age between the offender and the child
effect of the offence on the child
age of the child
nature of the offence, including any physical harm or threat of harm to the child or another
need to protect the child or other children from the risk of reoffending
any relationship between the offender and the child
need to deter similar behaviour by other offenders to protect children
prospects of rehabilitation, including availability of treatment
offender’s antecedents, age and character
any remorse or lack of remorse of the offender
any medical, psychiatric, prison or other relevant report relating to the offender
anything else about the safety of children under 16 the court considers relevant
Therefore, it is critical to obtain early advice from an experienced sexual offence lawyer to prepare material and submissions which support the above arguments.
Recent changes in the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) also limits the weight that can be given to good character evidence. The court is now not required to into account good character, if it assisted the offender in committing the offence. This includes situations where sexual offences occur in circumstances where trust or reputation played a role in the alleged conduct.
Overall, the law makes it clear that child sexual offences are treated as a distinct and more serious category and so advice from a sexual offence lawyer experienced in these types of charges is critical.
What should I do if I am being investigated by the police?
If you are being investigated or charged with a serious sexual offence:
do not answer police questions without legal advice
keep any messages or material that may be relevant to your defence and provide it to your criminal lawyer
do not contact the complainant or witnesses
get urgent legal advice before making decisions
Early advice is critical.
What is a ‘lineal descendant’
A charge of indecent treatment of a child under 16 is aggravated (there is a higher penalty), if the child was, to the knowledge of the accused, his or her lineal descendant.
This means that the prosecution must prove a direct biological relationship, such as a child or grandchild. It does not extend to step-relations (R v D [2003] QCA 455). The prosecution must also prove that the accused knew the relationship existed, although it is not necessary to prove they understood its legal classification.
However, even if a step-relationship does not fall within ‘lineal descendant’, the offence can still be aggravated where the accused was the child’s guardian or had the child under their care at the time. In those circumstances, the same higher maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment applies.
This is narrower than the position for incest under s 222 of the Criminal Code 1899 (Qld). That offence extends to a broader range of relationships, including siblings, parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, nephews and nieces (s 222(1), and expressly includes half, adoptive and certain step relationships (s 222(5)–(6).
FAQ - Indecent Treatment of a Child charges in Queensland
-
Indecent treatment of a child is an offence under section 210 of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld).
It covers situations where a person unlawfully deals with a child under 16 in a way that is indecent.
“Deals with” is defined broadly. It can include touching, treating, or acting towards a child in a manner that the community would regard as indecent.
-
Generally no. Under section 229 of the Criminal Code, unless otherwise stated, it is immaterial that you did not know that the child was under that age.
However, in limited circumstances, a defence of mistake of fact under section 24 of the Criminal Code may still arise.
This would usually require evidence that you honestly and reasonably believed the complainant was of legal age, based on the circumstances at the time.
Whether this defence is available depends on the evidence.
Because this area is highly technical and fact-specific, it is important to get legal advice early to understand whether a mistake of fact defence could apply in your situation.
-
The penalty depends on the circumstances of the case.
The maximum penalty is 14 years imprisonment, but this increases to 20 years imprisonment if certain aggravating factors are present. These include:
if the child is under 12 years of age
if the child is your lineal descendant (for example, your biological child or grandchild)
if you were the child’s guardian or had the child in your care at the time
if the child had an impairment of the mind
-
“Indecent” is given its ordinary meaning.
It is conduct that offends against current community standards of decency.
The Court may look at factors like the ages of the parties, the relationship between them, what was said or done, and whether the conduct had a sexual purpose or connotation.
-
No. Consent is not relevant. A child under 16 cannot legally consent to indecent dealing, so it is no defence that the child appeared to agree.
-
Section 210(5) sets out general defences, which may include circumstances where the conduct was authorised, justified, or excused by law.
Section 210(5A) provides a defence to liability in relation to certain circumstances of aggravation (for example, where the allegation involves a position of care or guardianship).
Importantly, the burden of proof for these defences rests with the defendant, not the prosecution. This means you would need to establish the defence on the balance of probabilities, rather than the prosecution having to disprove it.
In addition, a mistake of fact defence under section 24 of the Criminal Code may apply. For example, if there is credible evidence you honestly and reasonably believed the complainant was of or above the legal age.
In addition to the limited statutory defences under the Criminal Code, a common defence is to challenge the credibility and reliability of the witnesses. This may involve:
Arguing that the alleged acts did not occur at all
Highlighting inconsistencies in the complainant’s evidence or prior statements
Showing that there are gaps or weaknesses in the prosecution case
Using expert evidence, such as medical or psychological reports, where appropriate
In many cases, these arguments focus on whether the prosecution can prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt.
If the evidence is inconsistent, unreliable, or not supported by other material, the Court may find the charge is not proven.
Facing serious charges in Queensland?
If you or someone you know needs to speak with the best criminal lawyers in Queensland, contact Ashworth Lawyers today.
Call us on (07) 3012 6531 or fill in our Quick Enquiry form for a confidential discussion with our Brisbane criminal lawyers.